Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Respirology ; 28(1): 47-55, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36065624

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Decline in hospitalizations for various respiratory diseases has been reported during the COVID-19 pandemic, but what led to such an observation is uncertain. METHODS: This was a territory-wide, retrospective cohort study involving all public hospital admissions in Hong Kong from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2020. Hospital admissions for respiratory diseases, including asthma, COPD and non-COVID pneumonia, were assessed. COVID-related admissions were excluded from this study. The time of commencement of the pandemic was taken from the fourth week of January 2020. The associations between air pollutant levels, influenza and mask-wearing rates with hospital admissions were assessed by mediation analyses. RESULTS: There were altogether 19,485, 78,693 and 238,781 admissions for asthma, COPD and non-COVID pneumonia from January 2017 to December 2020. There was a marked reduction in hospital admissions of asthma, COPD and non-COVID pneumonia (37%, 36% and 12% decrease in average daily admissions, respectively) during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to before. Air pollutant levels and influenza rate were decreased while mask-wearing rate was increased. Collinearity of mask-wearing rates and pandemic year was observed. For COPD, NO2 , SO2 , PM10 and influenza rates (4%, 11%, 4% and 4% of the total effect, respectively), while for non-COVID pneumonia, PM10 and influenza rates (11% and 52%, respectively) had significant mediation effect on changes in hospital admissions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a decrease in air pollutant levels and influenza rate had mediation effect on the reduction in hospitalizations of COPD and non-COVID pneumonia.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Poluição do Ar , Asma , COVID-19 , Influenza Humana , Pneumonia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Transtornos Respiratórios , Doenças Respiratórias , Humanos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Pandemias , Análise de Mediação , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Asma/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar/análise
2.
Respirology ; 26(5): 504-506, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33660367
3.
Respirology ; 26(1): 72-79, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32542906

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have suggested that early pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes post-AECOPD are an effective and safe intervention for reducing hospital admissions and improving quality of life. This study assessed whether a short course of exercise training post-AECOPD with periodic reinforcement exercise training and phone call reminders reduces readmissions and increases physical activity in COPD patients. METHODS: Subjects were randomized into either the (i) intervention group (IG), consisting of 4-8 weeks of training supervised by a physiotherapist and phone contact every 2 weeks by a case manager providing support and reinforcement of continuous exercise at home or (ii) usual care group (UG), which had no input by a physiotherapist or case manager. Readmissions were assessed at 12 months. Activities of all patients were assessed by an activity monitor at baseline, 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: Altogether, 136 subjects were included and randomized (68 in IG and 68 in UG). The age, gender and FEV1 % predicted were 75.0 ± 6.7 years, 132 males and 47.0 ± 16.2%, respectively. The mean number of readmissions for AECOPD (1.06 vs 1.72 times, P = 0.014) was less and time to first readmission was increased (146.8 vs 122.4 days, P = 0.005) in the IG versus UG at 12 months. At 12 months, there was no change in activity measured by activity monitor between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This programme decreased exacerbation frequency and increased the time of readmissions for AECOPD. It did not improve physical activities and exercise tolerance at 12 months.


Assuntos
Progressão da Doença , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/reabilitação , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Readmissão do Paciente , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Qualidade de Vida , Testes de Função Respiratória , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Respirology ; 25(3): 259-266, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31385389

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Airway inflammation accompanying exacerbations varies among individuals with some having neutrophilic, while others showing eosinophilic inflammation. This study assessed the cut-off values of blood eosinophil count for identifying subjects with longer hospital length of stay (LOS) with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). METHODS: Patients were recruited at presentation to the hospital with an AECOPD. Complete blood picture with differential count was taken on admission. Patients were treated with a standard course of systemic corticosteroid and antibiotic and evaluated at 8 weeks post-exacerbation for lung function measurement and 6-min walk. They were followed up in 1 year for any readmissions or mortality. Cut-off values of eosinophils for assessment of longer LOS were calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 346 patients with admission eosinophil count were included in the analysis (333 (96.2%) were males; mean ± SD age: 74.9 ± 7.8 years; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ): 43.4 ± 16.3% predicted). The median (interquartile range (IQR)) of the absolute peripheral eosinophil count, percent eosinophil count and LOS were 0.11 (0.25) × 109 /L, 1 (3) % and 5 (7) days, respectively. Using the median LOS of ≥5 days as the cut-off, ROC analysis of the cut-off value of eosinophil count associated with longer LOS was at <2% (area under the curve (AUC): 0.666, P < 0.001) while absolute eosinophil count was at <0.144 × 109 /L (AUC: 0.645, P < 0.001). These eosinophil cut-off values could predict longer LOS independent of age, lung function and previous hospital admissions, but had no association with readmissions for AECOPD and mortality at 12 months. CONCLUSION: An eosinophil value of <0.144 × 109 /L on admission or <2% was associated with longer hospital LOS for AECOPD.


Assuntos
Eosinófilos , Tempo de Internação , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/sangue , Exacerbação dos Sintomas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Sob a Curva , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Masculino , Readmissão do Paciente , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Curva ROC , Taxa de Sobrevida
5.
Respir Res ; 20(1): 210, 2019 Sep 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31519188

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and asthma are associated with a variety of precipitating factors including infection. This study assessed the infective viral etiologies by real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction of patients hospitalized with AECOPD and asthma exacerbations. In addition, infective etiologies were assessed for association with the clinical outcome of the patients. METHODS: Adults admitted with AECOPD and asthma exacerbations between August 2016 and July 2017 were recruited. Nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) samples were obtained from the patients within 1-2 days of admission and subjected to pathogen detection and human rhinovirus (HRV) typing. RESULTS: Altogether 402 patients with AECOPD, 80 stable COPD, 100 asthma exacerbation and 21 stable asthma subjects were recruited. Among those admitted for AECOPD and asthma exacerbations, 141(35.1%) and 45(45.0%) respectively had pathogens identified in the NPA specimens. The commonest virus identified was influenza A followed by HRV. HRV typing identified HRV-A and HRV-C as the more common HRV with a wide variety of genotypes. Identification of pathogens in NPA or HRV typing otherwise did not affect clinical outcomes including the hospital length of stay, readmission rates and mortality except that identification of pathogens in asthma exacerbation was associated with a lower rate of readmissions at 30 and 60 days. CONCLUSIONS: Many respiratory viruses were associated with AECOPD and asthma exacerbation. HRV-A and HRV-C were the more common HRV associated with exacerbations. Identification of pathogens in NPA was associated with less readmissions for asthma patients at 30 and 60 days. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02866357 .


Assuntos
Asma/microbiologia , Asma/virologia , Bactérias/química , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/microbiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/virologia , Infecções Respiratórias/microbiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Rhinovirus/química , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Função Respiratória , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...